IN Brief:
- PepsiCo has ended manufacturing and warehouse activity at its Cheverly bottling operation in Maryland.
- The restructuring removed 143 jobs, including 98 union positions, while local sales and delivery continue.
- PepsiCo linked the decision with changes in consumer demand, technology and its wider operating network.
PepsiCo has ended manufacturing and warehouse operations at its long running Cheverly bottling facility in Maryland, while retaining local sales and delivery activity.
The restructuring removed 143 jobs from the site, including 98 union positions, following a change that took effect in September. Employees affected came from manufacturing, warehousing, fleet and transport functions as PepsiCo reduced the plant from a production and distribution operation to a narrower sales and delivery presence.
Cheverly has operated for more than 60 years and became a prominent industrial presence in the town. PepsiCo said the decision reflects changes in consumer demand, technology and the configuration of its operating network rather than a withdrawal of its products from the local market.
Sales and delivery teams will continue operating in the area, allowing PepsiCo to keep serving customers without maintaining the bottling and warehousing functions previously located at Cheverly. Production and local market coverage will therefore take place through different parts of the network.
Beverage manufacturing and final delivery do not have to sit at the same site. Finished drinks can be produced elsewhere and moved into a local distribution operation, provided the wider bottling network has enough capacity and transport capability to absorb the additional flows.
Ending production at Cheverly consequently shifts volume elsewhere rather than removing it automatically. PepsiCo has not publicly identified through the current reporting where all of the site’s output will be produced, so the effect on surrounding plants cannot yet be quantified.
Any redistribution has to account for packaging formats, product mix and regional demand as well as nominal line capacity. Carbonated soft drinks, water and other beverages can require different filling systems, while package size and container type determine whether another plant can take on a product without substantial changes.
Warehouse closure creates a separate network change. Bottling sites frequently combine production with finished goods storage because products can move directly from filling and palletising into inventory before dispatch. Once local production stops, retaining the same warehouse footprint can become less useful if stock is replenished from another manufacturing location.
PepsiCo has said local sales and delivery will continue without disruption, keeping the final route to customers in place while the upstream supply point changes. Transport between replacement production or warehouse nodes and the Cheverly market will therefore carry more of the operational load.
The Town of Cheverly was formally notified about the workforce reduction on 14 September and initially sought more information about the future of the plant. Local officials described PepsiCo as an important employer and revenue contributor and asked which operations would remain once manufacturing ended.
Subsequent reporting confirmed that sales and delivery are continuing, but the loss of manufacturing substantially changes the site’s industrial role. More than six decades of local production have ended, removing jobs across processing and associated logistics functions.
PepsiCo told affected workers it would provide pay and benefits continuation through 13 November alongside transition support. The closure reached beyond one production department into warehouse, fleet and transport roles, reflecting the way bottling plants combine manufacturing with the movement and storage of finished products.
PepsiCo’s explanation also points to the way beverage networks are being reassessed against demand and technology. Higher throughput filling lines, warehouse automation and network planning can change how much regional infrastructure is required to serve the same market, particularly where newer sites can absorb volume previously spread across several plants.
Consolidating production can improve asset utilisation, although the trade off can include longer transport routes or greater dependence on individual plants if disruption occurs. PepsiCo has not disclosed enough operational detail to show how that balance was assessed at Cheverly.
The confirmed outcome is narrower but significant: manufacturing and warehousing have ended, 143 positions have been removed, and sales and delivery continue as PepsiCo reorganises how drinks reach the Maryland market.
Cheverly therefore remains part of PepsiCo’s customer facing network, but after more than 60 years it no longer functions as a beverage manufacturing site.



