IN Brief:
- The US Manufacturing PMI increased to 55.6, its highest reading since May 2022.
- Food, beverage, and tobacco manufacturing reported overall growth, higher employment, inventories, imports, and backlogs.
- Raw-material prices continued to increase while supplier delivery times lengthened.
The Institute for Supply Management reported expansion across US food, beverage, and tobacco manufacturing during July, even as the sector continued to face higher raw-material prices and slower supplier deliveries.
The national Manufacturing PMI reached 55.6, up 2.3 percentage points from June and its highest reading since May 2022. The wider manufacturing sector expanded for a seventh consecutive month, with new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories all above their respective expansion thresholds.
Food, beverage, and tobacco products was one of four large manufacturing industries reporting overall growth. The sector also reported increasing employment and inventories, slower supplier deliveries, higher order backlogs, increased imports, and rising raw-material prices.
The combination is more useful than the headline PMI alone. It points to an operating environment in which activity remains strong enough to support expansion, while supply lead times and input costs continue to complicate purchasing, scheduling, and margin control.
Expansion is not uniform growth
The ISM report is a diffusion survey rather than a measure of absolute production volume. A sector can be classified as expanding when more respondents report improvement than deterioration, even when the scale of change varies widely between companies and product categories.
Food, beverage, and tobacco manufacturing includes businesses with very different cost structures, demand patterns, and production cycles. A large ambient-food processor buying grain, metal cans, and corrugated cases faces different pressures from a chilled dairy operation, brewer, or tobacco manufacturer. The sector result should therefore be read as direction rather than a single condition shared by every plant.
July’s employment reading is notable because the food-related sector was among those reporting workforce growth. That may reflect higher schedules, vacancies being filled, or preparation for future production, but the survey does not distinguish between permanent recruitment, temporary labour, or replacement of previous departures.
Higher inventories also require interpretation. Raw-material and finished-goods stocks may rise because businesses expect stronger demand, but they can also increase when deliveries arrive earlier than production requires, companies build buffers against disruption, or sales fall short of forecasts.
Customer inventories across manufacturing remained in “too low” territory, a condition ISM normally treats as supportive of future production. Food manufacturers still have to separate genuine replenishment from temporary order patterns, particularly where customers are adjusting safety stocks in response to tariffs, geopolitical disruption, or volatile freight conditions.
Costs remain embedded in the recovery
The Prices Index stood at 71.1 in July. That was lower than in June, but it remained firmly in increasing territory for a 22nd month. Food, beverage, and tobacco producers were among the industries paying more for raw materials.
Commodities reported as rising included corn, corrugated products, freight, paper products, plastics, resins, soybean meal, and several metals. Not every item affects every food plant, but the list reaches across ingredients, primary packaging, secondary packaging, maintenance, and logistics.
A reduction in the rate of increase is not the same as a fall in prices. Purchasing teams may experience less acceleration while still paying materially more than under previous contracts. Manufacturers must decide whether to absorb those increases, reformulate, alter pack specifications, negotiate with customers, or seek productivity improvements.
Supplier deliveries slowed for an eighth month across manufacturing, with food, beverage, and tobacco among the affected industries. Slower delivery readings can accompany stronger demand, but they can also reflect transport constraints, component shortages, import delays, or supplier-capacity problems.
For food operations, late delivery of a low-cost item can stop a high-value line. Labels, closures, processing aids, ingredients, cleaning chemicals, spare parts, and packaging films may represent a small share of product cost while remaining essential to release finished goods. The commercial response is often more inventory, which then consumes cash and warehouse capacity.
The sector also reported higher imports. Imported machinery components, ingredients, packaging materials, and commodities can widen sourcing options, but they also increase exposure to exchange rates, customs procedures, freight costs, and geopolitical disruption.
Backlogs test plant discipline
Food, beverage, and tobacco manufacturers were among the industries reporting higher order backlogs. Backlogs can support future output, although they also indicate that orders are arriving faster than some businesses can complete them.
Plants facing backlogs must determine whether the constraint is labour, equipment availability, maintenance, changeover time, ingredient supply, packaging, or warehouse capacity. Adding shifts may increase output quickly, but it can raise overtime, training, quality, and reliability risks if the underlying bottleneck sits elsewhere.
The wider Production Index reached 58.5, its strongest level since November 2021, but food, beverage, and tobacco was not listed among the industries reporting growth in that specific subindex. The sector’s overall expansion should therefore not be rewritten as evidence of a universal surge in food output.
July provides a constructive demand signal, with the food-related sector expanding and employment rising. It also shows that the recovery carries familiar industrial baggage: expensive inputs, slower deliveries, larger inventories, and growing backlogs.
The useful question is not whether the PMI is above 50. It is whether new demand can be converted into shipped product without allowing procurement costs, working capital, labour pressure, or plant constraints to consume the benefit.



