Gelita targets low-sugar confectionery texture challenge

Gelita targets low-sugar confectionery texture challenge

Gelita is tackling texture in lower-sugar confectionery and protein bars. Soluform and Optibar support reformulation across gummies and bar formats.


IN Brief:

  • Gelita is promoting Soluform for gummies and Optibar for protein and cereal bar applications.
  • The ingredient systems target reduced sugar, higher protein, texture control, and manufacturing compatibility.
  • The portfolio reflects growing formulation pressure across confectionery, snacks, and active nutrition.

Gelita is targeting healthier confectionery and snack formulation with Soluform for gummies and Optibar for bars, placing texture and protein functionality at the centre of reduced-sugar product development.

The ingredient systems are designed for manufacturers working across fruit gummies, protein bars, cereal bars, marshmallows, candies, and hybrid snack formats. Gelita is focusing on two persistent development challenges: reducing sugar without losing structure, and increasing protein without creating dense, dry, or unpleasant textures.

Soluform is aimed at gummy and confectionery applications where sugar reduction can destabilise the finished product. Sugar contributes sweetness, bulk, texture, water activity, bite, shelf-life behaviour, and processing performance. When sugar is reduced, those functions still have to be rebuilt in the formulation.

Optibar targets bar applications, where collagen peptide functionality can be used to improve texture and binding. High-protein bars can become hard, crumbly, dry, sticky, or grainy over shelf life, while cereal bar binders often depend on sugar-rich syrups. Reducing sugar while holding inclusions together requires a system that performs through mixing, forming, cutting, packing, and storage.

Healthier indulgence has moved well beyond a narrow diet category. Confectionery and snacking brands are being pushed toward reduced sugar, higher protein, improved nutrition, and cleaner ingredient positioning, while the eating experience still has to feel like a treat. Texture, aroma, sweetness, chew, snap, melt, and visual appeal remain central to repeat purchase.

Gummies and bars show the technical difficulty particularly clearly. Gummies offer convenient portioning and strong flavour delivery, but sugar reduction can affect chew, stability, and water activity. Bars provide nutrition density and portability, but high-protein systems often struggle with shelf-life texture. The formulation has to work on a production line, not just in a development kitchen.

Protein-bar development is already moving toward texture-led innovation, with aerated and lighter bar concepts showing how manufacturers are trying to move beyond dense, chewy formats. Gelita’s ingredient approach differs, but it sits within the same wider drive to make high-protein products less punishing to eat.

Protein has become mainstream across dairy, bakery, confectionery, beverages, snacks, powders, and meal replacements. That broader adoption has changed expectations. Products with strong nutrition panels still need a credible eating experience, and the tolerance for chalky textures or hard bars is falling as the category matures.

Reduced-sugar confectionery faces a similar manufacturing problem. Removing sugar can force changes in cooking conditions, water activity, gelling behaviour, flavour release, sweetness profile, and shelf-life stability. Alternative sweeteners and fibres can help, but they can also introduce aftertaste, digestive tolerance concerns, stickiness, and process changes.

The strongest ingredient systems in this market are those that fit into existing production environments with limited disruption. A formulation that requires extensive new equipment, unusually slow processing, difficult handling, or costly waste controls will struggle even if the nutrition claim is attractive. Scalable reformulation depends on processability as much as sensory quality.

Category boundaries are also becoming less stable. Confectionery is borrowing from active nutrition, while nutrition brands are borrowing from confectionery. Protein gummies, indulgent bars, low-sugar chews, functional sweets, and fortified snacks sit between traditional category definitions, creating more routes to market and more technical combinations to manage.

The commercial direction points toward functional rebuilding rather than simple subtraction. Removing sugar or adding protein is only the visible part of reformulation. Texture, flavour release, stability, cost, line speed, shelf-life behaviour, and packaging compatibility all decide whether the finished product can succeed at scale.

Gelita’s Soluform and Optibar portfolio gives confectionery and snack manufacturers another route through that complexity. The test will be whether healthier formulations can hold the sensory and processing discipline needed for high-volume production, where claims alone are not enough to protect a product.


Stories for you


  • Coolant packs face sharply different EPR costs

    Coolant packs face sharply different EPR costs

    Coolant pack classifications could sharply alter food distribution EPR costs. Hydropac has identified a substantial fee difference between water- and gel-based packs of equal nominal weight.


  • Compass builds seventy-million-meal Derby centre

    Compass builds seventy-million-meal Derby centre

    Compass will build a Derby centre producing seventy million meals. The 10,000-square-metre operation will combine central production, heat recovery, solar generation, and flexible meal formats.